and all this because: - Children were exposed to sexual content and potential online predators - The company was already internally aware of these risks - Even so, they allegedly projected an image of safety that was greater than the reality The decision was based on a consumer protection law from a US state and is significant because: It's the first time a state has managed to beat Meta in court over child safety issues It could pave the way for more similar lawsuits in the future Meta doesn't agree with the decision and has already said they intend to appeal. I at least don't think it'll do any good, and I know you think so too! https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cql75dn07n2o